Misconduct hearings outcomes

Outcomes from misconduct hearings will be displayed here for 28 days following the conclusion of each case.

Public Notice Outcome West Midlands Police

Date    
19 October 2020

Venue    
West Midlands Police Headquarters, Lloyd House, Colmore Circus Queensway, Birmingham, B4 6NQ 

Officer    
PC Huntbach 

Standards of Professional Behaviour Breached                    
Authority, Respect and Courtesy
Discreditable Conduct

Conduct that gave rise to breaches
In December 2018, PC Huntbach attended a Public House with a group of friends where he became heavily intoxicated.  He later went to the home address of one of them from where he was asked to leave by the homeowner but refused to do so.  

After been persuaded to leave the house, PC Huntbach remained outside on the driveway and forced his way back inside the house and in doing so caused damage to the property.  PC Huntbach then had to be ejected from inside the house by a number of persons.  

When PC Huntbach was back outside the house, he attacked the home owner causing injuries and damage to clothing. 

PC Huntbach had to be physically restrained by a number of persons.  Whilst he was forcibly resisting being restrained, PC Huntbach caused injuries to three of the persons who were restraining him.  
Finding    Proven – Gross Misconduct

Outcome     
Final Written Warning 

Legally Qualified Chair    
Harry Ireland 

West Midlands Police – Hearing Outcome

Date
5-6 October 2020

Venue
West Midlands Police Headquarters, Lloyd House, Colmore Circus Queensway, Birmingham 
B4 6NQ (Sat Nav B4 6AT)

Standards of Professional Behaviour breached    
Honesty & Integrity, Authority, Respect and Courtesy, Discreditable Conduct

Conduct that gave rise to breaches    
On 8 November 2019 PS Srivastava attended an internal interview for the role of supervisor. 

During the interview, the officer was asked a question under the heading “We are emotionally aware” in which they were required to give an example of how they considered a range of values and needs when making a decision that affects a group of people.  

It is alleged that they deliberately lied when answering this question by making up an incident which they knew had not happened.  They continued to lie about the incident when telephoned later the same day.

Finding    
Proven – Gross Misconduct

Outcome    
Final Written Warning 

Legally Qualified Chair    
Mr Callum Cowx

Feedback

Did you find the page you were looking for?
Did you find the information useful?
Rate this page (1 star poor – 5 stars excellent).
*Required field.